If the following benefits sound like something you’d like for your business, you need to use lean manufacturing principles:
- 80%+ waste reduction
- 50% lower production costs
- 80-90% reduction in standing inventory
- 90% lower cost of quality (it’s 90% cheaper to make quality products)
- 50% increased labor productivity
Lean is a system, method, school of thought, and even a way of life, all focused on reducing waste. Although it’s usually applied to manufacturing (hence “lean manufacturing principles”), the methods to achieve it can be used to reduce waste while maintaining high quality no matter what operation you’re running.
The key is knowing what each principle involves and how to use it, which is exactly what we’re going to cover today!
Keep reading to get the full rundown on the following lean principles (with two techniques for good measure):
- Eliminate waste
- Kaizen (continuous improvement)
- Respect human elements
- Heijunka (level production)
- JIT (Just In Time) production
- One piece flow
- Quality built-in
- Poka-Yoke (mistake proofing)
- Jidoka (detecting defects through automation)
Lean manufacturing principles
Elimination of waste
The elimination of waste is core to anything related to lean as a practice. Hence the name “lean”, as in, “with as little waste and/or excess as possible”.
To that end, one of the core lean manufacturing principles to follow is to make sure that there is as little waste as possible in and created by everything that you do. The more waste you eliminate, the more your business saves with every product it produces and every process carried out.
- Having standing inventory (wasting space and resources)
- Making unusable by-products
- Spreading out your workstations too much, increasing the travel time between them
- Production queues backing up due to bottlenecks
- Too many workers being assigned to a limited task
- Lacking process automation where it can be used
It’s difficult to cover every case possible where waste can be reduced since there are opportunities to do so in pretty much every task undertaken. However, if you document workflows you follow for everything you do it becomes much easier to see where waste is being generated and how to eliminate it.
For example, without managing your business processes you won’t know how tasks are being performed. You might know how they should be carried out, but you won’t know what methods your team uses in practice.
If you don’t know how your tasks are carried out in practice you won’t be able to reduce waste, as you won’t even know what part of your process is causing that waste.
While it’s almost impossible to completely eliminate waste, striving to do so will cause your processes and practices to continually improve and increase your efficiency.
Simply put, if you’re not focused on reducing your waste, you’re not using lean principles.
Kaizen (continuous improvement)
Reducing waste and continuous improvement go hand-in-hand as lean manufacturing principles. By continuing to improve your business and processes you can reduce waste as much as possible by eliminating whatever bottlenecks threaten to pop up and examining which processes are inefficient.
Beyond that, continuously striving to improve is a strong approach to take with any repeated task since any improvements you make will benefit all future results.
The only way to continuously improve your practices, however, is to document and manage your processes and procedures first. As with reducing waste, this lets you see where the gaps and inefficiencies in your business are, and thus what can be improved easily (or what improvements will have the greatest effect).
Continuous process improvement doesn’t need you to start off with good processes. Heck, you could argue that starting off with bad processes means that you have more to improve and thus more to gain from continuous improvement.
Instead, focus on making sure that the processes you’ve documented are accurate. There’s no point in documenting an idealized process for how things should be done, because then you have no idea where you currently stand and what improvements can be made.
It’s tough, but bite the bullet and document your processes accurately by talking to the employees involved and finding out what really happens on the front lines.
It’s better to have an accurate process that’s full of holes than an ideal model that doesn’t fit reality.
Respect your human elements
When talking about lean (or manufacturing principles as a whole), having a “respect for humanity” isn’t the first thing that springs to mind. Sure, you might value your employees and want them to be happy and engaged with their work, but making it a core principle running through every element of your business is more than most would be willing to do.
However, without a respect for humanity and the people in your organization, there’s no way you’ll be able to consistently perform at a high level.
It’s also a principle which is easy in theory, as there are only a few key elements to keep in mind:
- Don’t overwork your employees
- Show them the purpose behind their work (what it achieves)
- Align that purpose with their own goals
- Maintain high accountability for success and failures
- Get to the root of a problem by talking to the employee and letting them tell you in their own words
- Ensure their tasks have as little friction as possible (nothing stopping them from working through them)
- Challenge them without demanding
- Give stability, but also variety in their tasks
In practice, each of these become much harder to manage, since you’re dealing with humans and not predictable machines. Much of your success with this principle will come down to your communication skills and the dynamics of your team and managers – as much relies on your employees getting on and supporting each other as it does on you doing the same.
In turn, if you engage your employees and show them the respect they deserve, they will produce a more consistent output which is often also of a higher quality. This is because human error is naturally reduced, as employees aren’t zoning out all of the time because they hate their tasks or their work environment.
Heijunka (level production)
Heijunka is a Japanese word which (when applied to lean manufacturing) means “leveling production”. In turn, this means that no matter what happens, your output remains the same every day.
The theory is solid – by looking at your average order amount you can keep your production consistent and avoid having to rush to meet a particular order. On days where you produce more than you sell the excess goes into a “fluctuation stock”, with the opposite happening on days where more is sold than produced.
While having a set amount of fluctuation (or “safety”) stock might seem contradictory to the idea of reducing waste such as standing inventory, this isn’t nearly as wasteful as having an entire warehouse of inventory sitting there with no idea when it can be used.
To make sure that this safety stock gets sold and doesn’t just take up space and resources, you’ll need to carefully calculate (and adjust) your production rate to match the average order amount. You can then also calculate how big your safety stock needs to be by looking at the variance in order numbers from your average.
This will no doubt take a little trial and error, but leveling out your production lets you cement the most efficient practices possible and makes your work and output easy to predict.
Heijunka is a practice best suited to manufacturing where the product’s you’re making are either complex or take a long time to create, and when the demand for your products is fairly predictable. This is because your safety stock should allow you to always meet an order (which won’t be true if your demand spikes randomly) and having a consistent production rate is beneficial when a lot of work goes into your products.
JIT (Just In Time) production
JIT (“Just In Time”) is one of many schools of process innovation focused on reducing waste. As a manufacturing principle, it focuses on working on a task or item in order to meet demand and nothing more. Nothing is completed in excess, as that is considered waste (think standing inventory).
Unfortunately, JIT is incredibly hard to pull off and comes with so many caveats in practice that it’s difficult to even know where to start.
The ultimate goal is to have absolutely no inventory, whether that be raw resources, WIP items, or finished products. As such, applying JIT to an existing manufacturing operation requires the managers to rethink and reorganize the entire thing.
Not to mention that if you get your order predictions wrong or something happens to affect your output (en employee slows down or a machine breaks) there’s no safety net to fall back on. If you mess up, be prepared to fail to meet orders.
For this reason, JIT isn’t a must-have lean manufacturing principle. If you can achieve it then great, but otherwise consider breaking your operation into smaller sets of tasks to which JIT can be applied individually. That way you can benefit from the idea without the same level of danger associated with widespread application.
JIT doesn’t necessarily clash with Heijunka, but in most situations the method you use will depend on the complexity of your product and how predictable your demand is. Creating simple products on demand is possible because your customers won’t have to wait for very long, letting JIT flow have less of a negative in terms of how long they have to wait.
Having a highly unpredictable product demand is also more suited to JIT than Heijunka, since you can’t guarantee that any safety stock created will be used up instead of becoming surplus inventory.
One piece flow
One piece flow is the lean take on production queues and WIP (work-in-progress/process) products. By limiting your WIP to a single item you can greatly increase your efficiency and the quality associated with the end result.
Think of a production line with several workstations and a bulk order. Using one piece flow, one item is moved into the first workstation, all work there is completed, and then the product is moved to the next station. The next product is meanwhile moved to the first workstation.
One product is always being worked on at any given stage of the process, and nothing is left waiting for a station to be free. Travel times between workstations is as limited as possible (usually through an optimized floor layout) and tasks are grouped to spread the work as evenly as possible between stations.
To learn more, check out our article on the topic:
The concept of having quality built into your manufacturing processes is key to running an efficient, yet successful business. There’s no good in rapidly producing cheap-to-make products if the final results are full of defects and won’t sell, after all.
Quality usually suffers as a result of either bad processes or human error, and so this lean principle is achieved by using two techniques which I’ll cover individually:
- Poka-yoke (mistake proofing your processes)
- Jidoka (automatically detecting abnormalities)
Aside from these principles, quality is built into your processes by considering the value and product you’re providing your customers with, then making sure that your efficiency-saving methods don’t impact on the quality related to providing that value.
Poka-Yoke (mistake proofing)
Poka-yoke (a Japanese term roughly “mistake proofing”) is one of the techniques used to build quality into lean processes, be they for manufacturing workflows or otherwise.
The idea is that every process can be engineered to inherently prevent mistakes either through re-engineering tasks to suit a standard format or by including specific measures which make sure that mistakes are caught early and corrected.
For example, in a manufacturing process, you might have a task for attaching the arms to a toy robot. Let’s say that this is done by clipping the arms onto the body while inserting a spring into the shoulder joint to allow movement.
A standard process would probably just include instructions for putting the springs on the shoulder joints, then clipping the arms in place. While serviceable, this allows for human error to occur as there’s little stopping someone from forgetting to attach a spring. The mistake is then compounded by being hard (if not impossible) to spot at a glance, and correcting it later on requires the product to be disassembled.
To save this trouble, the poka-yoke equivalent would just add an extra step to prepare two springs in advance instead of taking them straight from the stockpile.
This simple change would let the worker instantly see whether they’ve inserted both springs, and thus prevent the mistake from taking place. At the very least it would let the worker identify their mistake early on and correct it before it becomes a bigger issue.
To learn more about this technique, check out our post on the topic:
Jidoka (detecting defects through automation)
Complimenting poka-yoke is jidoka – the principle that most defects can be automatically detected to completely remove human error from the equation.
Rather than making an employee check every product for defects or errors (such as a thread breaking on a loom), a machine is set up with checks built in to do the task automatically. When an error is detected, an alarm sounds to let the employees at hand know that something has gone wrong.
This human element is also why jidoka is known as “automation with a human touch”.
The lean manufacturing cycle
To round things off, it’s worth taking a moment to look over the lean manufacturing cycle, as this can also provide some useful lean manufacturing principles to follow.
The five steps in the lean manufacturing cycle are:
- Identify value (define what the value to the end customer is)
- Map the value stream (identify all steps in your process and eliminate those that don’t create value)
- Create flow (make the value steps occur in tight sequence to provide as much value to the customer as quickly as possible)
- Establish pull (make it so that customers are demanding or seeking out the product rather than you having to push it on them)
- Seek perfection (strive for perfection by using continuous improvement, eliminating waste, making reliable processes, and generally following the principles we covered earlier)
As you can see, while efficiency and reliability are important when applying lean principles to manufacturing, it’s just as vital to make sure that everything you do provides value to the end goal. After all, there’s no point in doing something efficiently if you achieve that by making the final result useless.
What do you think to using lean in manufacturing? Have any tips or cautionary tales on the topic? I’d love to hear from you in the comments below!
Solid article! Simple, concise, and informative.
I have been a Quality Engineer for 7 years and have only picked up on lean mfg principles (no official training).
My issue is overuse or not proper use of lean mfg principles by my co-workers.
My current Production Manager knows a lot of terms and acronyms, but can simply not apply any of them at all; he complicates them and says “this is how we did it before.”
How do you remedy/work with that?
The garment industry suffers from many of the problems facing any other manufacturing industry in the world today. But your article is very good. Keep it up
Easily the best explanation I have seen, thanks Ben!
Paul don’t worry you are not the only one. Unfortunately, the only way I have been successful at defeating the worst answer in the universe of “that is how we have always done it” is to….
1) Just up and do it, and as we say ask for forgiveness rather than permission.
2) Daunting amount of proof, data, and real world success.
3) Wait for them to retire.
Great article. I was going to grab your graphic and put it on my wall but I noticed in the circle it says “Seek Protection” instead of “Seek Perfection”.
Thank you for posting this informative article. Precise and well defined. I have been interviewing lately and find the interviewers throwing these words and acronyms around as if everyone should know. I have not been formally introduced to lean manufacturing principles and like others, I have picked it up on the fly while seeking to improve. And I whole heartedly agree with Peter Parks post.
This is fantastic! I would like to use this as the core document for a training program I am developing for my company. Factually based with down-to-earth explanations for the beginning levels of production associates and personnel.
Thank you for this!
A great read! We’re into Interiors and I see a lot of potential in reducing the amount of waste generation through the use of the Lean approach. Definitely going to make use of the above-mentioned tools in our future projects.
What an article! As I was reading I could understand why I have so many problems in my business. I will definitely use the Lean Principles.
Good article. I will discuss it with our production team.
Great article. Best take away, “never strive to start with the best process but always strive to make necessary improvements to your process”.
Lol…that animate gif just sums up frustration of LEAN management nicely
Great article. Can be very useful in our developing world.
Glad to hear you found it useful, Joshua.
Perfect article. It precise and adaptable.
Thanks Rillon. Glad to hear you found it useful.
A very good explanation of lean manufacturing. I was jus t refreshing my memory on lean principles. I took a company sponsored Greenbelt Six Sigma course back in 2012 and just wanted to get a fresh take on lean manufacturing. Appreciate the examples you gave. Keep up the good work!
Thanks Charles. Glad to hear you found it useful.
The five-step thought process for guiding the implementation of lean techniques picture is really interesting. I will use It in my Lean classes if you agree.
Go ahead – I hope your students find it useful!
Hey Jane, As long as the material is well-sourced, we’re happy for you to provide these resources to your students. Cheers
It is precise but with comprehensive information and highly interesting to read . Thank you very much, Mr Ben Mulholland.