Streamline your coding quality control with our comprehensive schedule template, facilitating automated and manual code reviews with regular reporting.
1
Identify coding standards and best practices
2
List down the specific points for review
3
Set up an automated code review tool
4
Run the automated code review tool
5
Gather and analyze the results from the automated tool
6
Conduct manual code review
7
Document issues identified during manual review
8
Approval: Code Reviewer Verifying Issues
9
Prepare report on identified issues and possible resolutions
10
Send report to the development team
11
Development team fixes the identified code issues
12
Re-run automated tool on updated code
13
Conduct manual review on updated code
14
Document improvements and remaining issues
15
Prepare final code review report
16
Approval: Project Manager
17
Provide feedback to the coding team
18
Set a schedule for next review
Identify coding standards and best practices
In this task, you will research and gather information about coding standards and best practices that should be followed during the coding quality review process. This will help ensure consistency and maintainability of the codebase. Consider questions such as: What are the industry-standard coding practices? Are there any specific coding guidelines for the programming language used? How can the code be structured for readability and maintainability? The desired result of this task is a comprehensive list of coding standards and best practices that will serve as a reference for the coding review.
List down the specific points for review
In this task, you will create a checklist of specific points that will be reviewed during the coding quality review. These points can include coding conventions, potential performance bottlenecks, error handling, security vulnerabilities, and other aspects that affect the code quality and maintainability. Consider questions such as: What specific aspects of the codebase should be examined? Are there any common mistakes that should be checked for? How can the review process be made more efficient? The desired result of this task is a comprehensive checklist of specific points to be reviewed during the coding quality review.
1
Coding conventions
2
Performance optimization
3
Error handling
4
Security vulnerabilities
5
Code modularity
Set up an automated code review tool
In this task, you will set up an automated code review tool that will help analyze the codebase for potential issues and adherence to coding standards. The tool can perform static code analysis, check for code smells, and provide suggestions for improvement. Consider questions such as: What automated code review tool will be used? How can the tool be integrated with the development environment? What rules or configurations need to be set for the tool to analyze the code effectively? The desired result of this task is a properly configured automated code review tool integrated with the development environment.
1
IDE plugin
2
Command-line tool
3
Web-based integration
Run the automated code review tool
In this task, you will run the configured automated code review tool on the codebase. The tool will analyze the code for potential issues and violations of coding standards. Consider questions such as: When should the automated code review be performed? How frequently should it be run? How can the tool be executed on the codebase? The desired result of this task is a report or list of issues identified by the automated code review tool.
Gather and analyze the results from the automated tool
In this task, you will gather and analyze the results from the automated code review tool. This will help identify common patterns, recurring issues, and areas of improvement in the codebase. Consider questions such as: How can the results from the automated tool be collected? What are the common issues found? How can the results be analyzed to identify patterns and areas of improvement? The desired result of this task is a summary of the results from the automated code review tool and insights for further analysis.
Conduct manual code review
In this task, you will manually review the codebase to identify issues that may have been missed by the automated code review tool. This can include architectural flaws, complex logic, code duplication, and other aspects that require human understanding. Consider questions such as: How can the codebase be effectively reviewed manually? What specific aspects should be examined? How can the manual review process be made more efficient? The desired result of this task is a manual review report with identified issues.
1
Architectural flaws
2
Complex logic
3
Code duplication
4
Code comments
5
Naming conventions
Document issues identified during manual review
In this task, you will document the issues identified during the manual code review. This documentation will serve as a reference for the development team to understand the identified issues and possible resolutions. Consider questions such as: How can the identified issues be documented effectively? Should there be a specific format or template for documenting the issues? How can the documentation be shared with the development team? The desired result of this task is a document or report listing the identified issues and possible resolutions.
Approval: Code Reviewer Verifying Issues
Will be submitted for approval:
Document issues identified during manual review
Will be submitted
Prepare report on identified issues and possible resolutions
In this task, you will prepare a report summarizing the identified issues from both the automated and manual code review. The report should include the issues, their severity, possible resolutions, and recommendations for improvement. Consider questions such as: What should be the format and structure of the report? How can the report effectively communicate the identified issues and their impact? How can the report be shared with the development team? The desired result of this task is a comprehensive report on the identified issues and possible resolutions.
Send report to the development team
In this task, you will send the prepared report on the identified issues and possible resolutions to the development team. This will ensure that the development team is aware of the issues and can take necessary actions to address them. Consider questions such as: Who should receive the report? What should be the subject line and body of the email? How can the report be shared securely with the team? The desired result of this task is a sent email with the report attached or included in the email body.
Code review report for {{form.Recipient}}
Development team fixes the identified code issues
In this task, the development team will work on addressing the identified code issues and implementing the suggested resolutions. They will make the necessary changes to the codebase to improve its quality and adherence to coding standards. Consider questions such as: How to prioritize and assign the fixing of identified code issues? Should there be a specific process or tracking system for managing the fixes? How can the development team coordinate and collaborate on the fixes? The desired result of this task is a codebase with the identified issues fixed and the suggested resolutions implemented.
Re-run automated tool on updated code
In this task, you will re-run the automated code review tool on the updated codebase to ensure that the identified issues have been properly addressed. This will help validate the effectiveness of the fixes and ensure that no new issues have been introduced. Consider questions such as: When should the re-run of the automated tool be performed? How can the tool be executed on the updated codebase? Who should verify the results? The desired result of this task is a report or list of issues from the re-run of the automated code review tool.
Conduct manual review on updated code
In this task, you will manually review the updated codebase to ensure that all the identified issues have been properly addressed and there are no new issues introduced. This will help validate the effectiveness of the fixes and provide additional confidence in the code quality. Consider questions such as: How can the updated code be effectively reviewed manually? What specific aspects should be examined? How can the manual review process be made more efficient? The desired result of this task is a manual review report on the updated code.
1
Architectural flaws
2
Complex logic
3
Code duplication
4
Code comments
5
Naming conventions
Document improvements and remaining issues
In this task, you will document the improvements made based on the fixes to the identified issues, as well as any remaining issues that still need attention. This documentation will serve as a reference for the development team and help track the progress of the codebase. Consider questions such as: How can the improvements and remaining issues be documented effectively? Should there be a specific format or template for documenting them? How can the documentation be shared with the development team? The desired result of this task is a document or report listing the improvements made and the remaining issues.
Prepare final code review report
In this task, you will prepare the final code review report summarizing the overall findings of the coding quality review process. The report should include the initial issues, the fixes and improvements made, remaining issues, and recommendations for future improvements. Consider questions such as: What should be the format and structure of the report? How can the report effectively communicate the overall findings and their impact? How can the report be shared with the development team and stakeholders? The desired result of this task is a comprehensive final code review report.
Approval: Project Manager
Will be submitted for approval:
Prepare final code review report
Will be submitted
Provide feedback to the coding team
In this task, you will provide feedback to the coding team based on the findings of the code review process. This feedback can include appreciation for the fixes and improvements made, as well as suggestions for further enhancements and adherence to coding standards. Consider questions such as: How can the feedback be effectively communicated to the coding team? Should there be a specific format or template for the feedback? How can the feedback be shared and discussed with the team? The desired result of this task is effective feedback provided to the coding team.
Set a schedule for next review
In this task, you will set a schedule for the next coding quality review. This will ensure that the codebase is regularly reviewed and maintained at a high quality level. Consider questions such as: What should be the frequency of the coding quality reviews? How can the schedule be communicated to the development team and stakeholders? Should there be a specific process or reminder system for managing the reviews? The desired result of this task is a set schedule for the next coding quality review.
