Research Audit Management Software
Plan research audits, assign evidence requests, document reviewer decisions, and verify corrective actions in one governed workflow. Process Street gives research offices and clinical quality teams a traceable record from audit scope through final closure.
Trusted by more than 3000 companies
Stop rebuilding the audit record after the work is done
A sponsor asks for evidence, one reviewer works from email, another marks findings in a spreadsheet, and corrective actions disappear into separate plans. Process Street turns that fragmented trail into assigned audit work with required files, due dates, approvals, conditional routing, and timestamps. Teams can run sponsor audits, protocol audits, clinical quality checks, and grant compliance reviews from repeatable workflows. Findings route to named owners, remediation requires proof, and an independent reviewer approves closure. NC State uses Process Street for research licensing and federal compliance work with a complete audit history. Keep an eRA system, CTMS, or protocol database when specialized submissions and study data are the core need.
Process Street for research audit execution
Run audit plans, evidence requests, interviews, findings, corrective actions, and closure reviews as one assigned workflow. Required fields and approval gates keep the record complete before work moves forward.
Learn more about OpsWhat to compare in research audit management software
Define the sponsor, study, protocol, award, control area, reviewer, evidence list, timeline, and approval path before fieldwork begins. Reuse the approved plan for recurring audits without copying an old spreadsheet.
Assign each document request to a named owner, require the correct file or response, track reviewer comments, and preserve every submission with its timestamp. Escalate late evidence before it delays the audit.
Guide interviews, sampling steps, protocol checks, and record review through a consistent path. Document the condition, requirement, evidence, severity, and reviewer decision together instead of splitting context across tools.
Send each finding to the right investigator, administrator, laboratory, finance, or compliance owner. Use conditional steps for higher-risk issues and require a response, due date, and supporting proof.
Keep a finding open until remediation evidence is reviewed and approved. Record who accepted the correction, when it closed, and whether a follow-up review or recurring control check is required.
Related solutions
More from the Audit Trail Software hub
Backed by happy clients
functional team collaboration.”
Frequently asked questions
Can't find the answer you need? Contact our support team.
Run research audits with proof built in
An industry-leading solution
Support that's actually there for you
Can't find the answer you need? Contact our support team.
