SIPOC stands for Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers. It is a one-page framework for defining a business process end to end: who feeds it, what goes in, what happens inside it, what comes out, and who receives it.

A SIPOC diagram is the fastest way to pull a fuzzy process into focus. You draw five columns, fill them in, and suddenly the hidden dependencies, missing handoffs, and unclear ownership are on the page where you can fix them. It is the default starting point for most Six Sigma, Lean, and business process management work, and it has become even more useful in the AI era, where you cannot hand a process to an agent until the inputs, outputs, and boundaries are spelled out explicitly.

Continue Reading

Productivity software in 2026 is less about collecting apps and more about building a stack that reduces coordination cost. AI changed the category, but it did not remove the need for structure. If anything, it raised the bar. The best tools now help teams search faster, draft faster, and move faster without losing ownership, approvals, or proof.

The bigger shift is that old list-style productivity advice has aged badly. You do not need a separate app for every tiny problem, and you should not build your stack around a handful of point solutions that are being absorbed by broader suites. The durable stack now is built around knowledge systems, communication systems, workflow systems, and an AI layer that can move across all of them.

Continue Reading

I presented at IRES 2026 in Charlotte last week. The room was insurance compliance leaders from carriers, MGAs, and state regulators. The number that got their attention: $16 billion.

That is the estimated annual cost of compliance operations inefficiency across U.S. insurance. Not regulatory fines. Not penalties. Internal cost: rework, manual evidence assembly, approval chasing, babysitting email threads that should have been automated years ago.

Continue Reading

I was on a call with a small business owner who runs an art studio. Four employees. She is the chief creative officer, the janitor, the marketer, and the teacher.

She asked me a question I hear constantly: “How long until the AI is actually useful?”

Continue Reading

I was generating marketing collateral. Ten design variations of the same document. Each one goes through a QA gate before it ships. The AI has to inspect every page, write what it actually sees, and attest that it meets the quality bar.

It batched all five remaining themes into a single command. Copy-pasted the same attestation for each one. Word for word. “All elements render correctly, typography is clean, layout is balanced.” Five times. Identical.

Continue Reading

You don’t have a skill. You have a novice.

My team keeps telling me they’ve “built a skill.” One person gave Claude a short prompt and hit create. Another found something on a marketplace and installed it. Both walked away thinking the job was done.

We keep giving AI agents access to our tools and then acting surprised when they do something unexpected. The problem was never the AI. The problem is we never gave it the rulebook.

For years, workflow automation meant connecting tools through integrations. If this, then that. Trigger here, action there. It worked for simple tasks. It broke under complexity. And it was built for humans who could read error logs and fix broken triggers when things went sideways. AI agents do not work that way. They need context, not just connections.

Continue Reading

Value capture is the whole point of an acquisition. Companies will spend more than $2 trillion on M&A this year, and most of that capital will fail to do what the deal memo promised. Harvard Business Review puts the failure rate at 70 to 90 percent. Deloitte’s 2025 M&A study found 47% of executives admit their last deal underperformed expectations. The work that separates the winners from the losers is not the deal. It is the four operating decisions that follow it.

When the strategy is wrong, the cleanest version of acquisitions like Daimler Chrysler and Sprint/Nextel stick to a balance sheet for a generation. When it is right, you end up looking like the Apple of acquisitions: dozens of quiet bolt-ons, a clear thesis, and compounding value year after year. The difference comes down to four levers that drive roughly 80% of the value capture in successful deals.

Continue Reading

VRIO is a four-step business analysis framework that evaluates whether your resources and capabilities are Valuable, Rare, costly to Imitate, and supported by your Organization. If a resource passes all four tests, you have a sustained competitive advantage.

The framework was developed by strategic management professor Jay Barney and has been used by businesses across the globe for decades. Whether you are a startup founder stress-testing your moat or a Fortune 500 team evaluating a new capability, VRIO gives you a clear, repeatable way to answer the question: do we actually have a defensible advantage?

Imagine a military regiment holding a position of key tactical importance, let’s say a bridge. Situational awareness is crucial. The success of the operation depends on access to information that can inform situational awareness, and provide tactical & strategic advantage. In other words, a situation where information is nothing short of vital.

Such a regiment would have access to a large-scale technological intelligence network: aircraft spotters, satellite-mounted motion sensors, heat detectors, and communication eavesdroppers. Commanders with high-bandwidth taps into the supporting intelligence network should have access to vital information to enable decision-making while in the field.

Continue Reading